I own a minivan and the complete works of journey; honestly, from the point of view of being cool, i might as well be dead. You might find what I have to say useful anyway. The bad News: Right Now, your Writing Sucks. When I was a teenager, my writing sucked, too. If you dont believe me, check these out: A short story i wrote in high school, and (God help us all) the lyrics to a prog-rock concept album I wrote in my first year of college. Yeah, they suck pretty bad. But at the time, i thought they were pretty good.
St josephs catholic high school
If you have any suggestions for other types of worksheets to be added to these, please contact me any i'll try my best. . There is a contact button at the bottom of every page or you can post a suggestion in the forums. Dear teenage Writers: hi there. I was once a teenage writer like you (see goofy picture to the right although that was so long ago that between now and then, i could have been a teenager all over again. Nevertheless, recently ive been thinking about offering some thoughts and advice on being a teenage writer, based on my own experiences of being one, and on my experiences of being a teenage writer who kept being a writer when he grew. So here are some of those thoughts, lazy for your consideration. Im going to talk to you about writing as straight as I can; theres a possibility that some of what I say to you might come off as abrupt and condescending. I apologize in advance for that, but you should know that I sometimes come off as abrupt and condescending toward everyone,. E., its not just you. Also, i hope you dont mind if I dont go out of my way to use current slang and such; theres very little more pathetic than a 36-year-old man dropping slang to prove hes hip to the kids.
There are many sites that golf offer free crossword makers if you want to make crosswords with word hints and not pictures. There are two versions of these games; one has just the pictures and a second has just the words. . Students can travel around the board talking about the item, simply saying the English word, reading the word and then using it in a sentence, and more. . It's up to you. there are two pages with pictures and two blank lines for students to write anything they can about each picture. . It can be as simple as 'i like.' and 'This.'. Use the right-hand menu to navigate to each worksheet page. .
there are 3 versions with 2 different puzzles for each version. . The first version has the words written out at the bottom for students to look for in the. . The second general version has just the pictures and thesis the students have to find the words in the puzzle. . The third has pictures and a place for students to write the words after they find them. there is one crossword. . It has images to represent all of the vocabulary. . Students can look at the picture and write the word in the appropriate spot. .
Each worksheet set contains the following 6 types of worksheets: : there are pictures on the left and the words on the right. . Students connect the pictures to the words and then trace the words. . There are 2 versions; one with the words written out in dot form to be traced and a second with some of the letters missing for the students to think about and fill. there are pictures on the left and three spaces on the right for students to write the words. . There are three versions of this worksheet. . The first page has the words in dotted form to be traced three times. . The second has the word once in dot form to be traced then written two more times. . The third simply has 3 blanks to write the words.
Grammar Instruction with Attitude
Aside from that, though, i'm not sure how Elements became a classic. VT: do you feel a certain sympathy with bierce, or does he remain a distant curmudgeon? JF: I had always vaguely assumed that bierce's cranky persona was just an act. Learning about his life made me sadder but wiser. He had a tough time of it — he never finished high school and educated himself (pretty impressively he took a bullet in the head fighting at Kennesaw mountain; his two sons died young, in stupid ways; his marriage went bad; and he was never. I'm afraid — or is it "I fear"? — that "Bitter bierce" wasn't just a jokey nickname.
Jan Freeman has been writing the boston Sunday globe 's weekly language column, "The word since 1997. A lifelong usage geek with a graduate degree in English, she has worked as an editor at the real expert Paper, boston and Inc. Magazines, and the boston Globe. She lives in Newton, massachusetts. To learn more about her annotated edition of Ambrose bierce's Write it Right, please visit the walker books website).
And my favorite — an example of extreme biercean literalism — is his ban on "spending time." we don't actually spend it, he says — it "goes from us against our will." VT: do you think bierce's failure rate serves as a warning for current. JF: I think it should. Even before i did the book i had started pointing out, in my language column, that most word-usage peeves don't last long. A novel usage may disappear, or it may be accepted as standard, but relatively few — like the ones Bryan Garner labels " skunked terms " — are bones of contention for decades or centuries. It's a waste of time and a distraction to spend your life looking out for misuses of enormity or hopefully, but the evidence suggests that lots of people need that little hit of smugness that comes with pointing out the errors of others.
VT: How would you compare Write It Right to Strunk and White, in terms of style and tone? JF: Strunk's original Elements of Style appeared in 1918, just nine years after Write It Right, and it shares bierce's terseness, though not his brutality. Strunk lays down the law, but his audience is college students, not journalists and general readers. White's 1959 revision of Elements is equally dogmatic about the rules — even rules that have aged badly since Strunk's time — but White's additions give the project a gentlemanly gloss. VT: Why do you think Elements of Style has been enshrined as a classic, but bierce has largely been forgotten? JF: bierce's book had a lot of competition. All through his adult life — or so — usage was a hot topic, both in England and in America. And a century is a long time, after all. And though Elements has its share of ridiculous fetishes — some shared with bierce, like "don't say 'six people say 'persons — the White-edited version is 50 years younger than bierce's book.
Play free sudoku, a popular Online puzzle game play free
Ovation was "really" a minor Roman triumph, and should not be used business for applause. Talented couldn't exist because there was no verb "to talent." Arguments like these may slow acceptance of a new sense, but it's hard to tell; words rise and fall in popularity for all sorts of reasons, whether they're opposed or not. VT: Was his "blacklist" simply based on idiosyncratic dislikes? JF: Much of it was common wisdom among the popular usage writers of his time and the preceding decades, like richard Grant White and Alfred Ayres. There was no shortage of borrowing, naturally — but most of the usagists had a few original peeves to throw into the mix, and bierce was no exception. VT: What are a few of his more befuddling peeves? JF: Why did he think "a coat of paint" should be "a coating"? I couldn't find any other mention of that notion in the literature. He objected to stand for "endure" i can't stand it and to say as in "have a say both of them centuries old.
JF: It's not just his advice; when usage mavens devote their energy to stopping extensions of meaning, they generally fail. After all, jonathan Swift was railing against mob, bully, and banter two centuries before bierce wrote. And especially in bierce's era, when neatening up the language was a widely shared ambition, usagists tried to impose distinctions that had never existed in practice — like assigning "I fear" and "I'm afraid" to different degrees of anxiety. Words are constantly shifting and stretching their senses, and historically, the word police have taken note of a few of these changes and energetically opposed them. The reasons they give tend to come after the disapproval, and to be applied somewhat arbitrarily. Electrocute and reportorial were bad, in bierce's day, because they couldn't properly be derived from Latin. Endorse used figuratively was vulgar commercial language.
many people still read and admire his weird, Twilight Zone-ish short stories and his accounts of the civil War, which he saw firsthand as a young Union soldier. And of course he was a famous opinion journalist in his prime, a sort of maureen Dowd of the west. VT: How have bierce's pronouncements stood the test of time? JF: Oh, probably half of them are irrelevant, mysterious, or utterly absurd today. Nobody now says gents, few people dislike pants, and men are no longer offended that women have appropriated the word dress for their own garment. The difference between insignificant and trivial is no longer one for the usage books, and endorse doesn't sound vulgar and commercial. (We have a new set of business buzzwords to despise.) A handful of his peeves are familiar, especially among journalists — don't use "over 60 say "more than 60" — but many of them are real headscratchers. VT: Why do you think so much of his advice has been rendered obsolete?
JF: I had been dipping into, write It Right for years — it's printed as an appendix to Theodore bernstein's. Miss london Thistlebottom's Hobgoblins, a usage book i've owned since my earliest copy editing days. Some of bierce's peeves were familiar, of course — people still complain about aggravate for irritate — but lots of them were mysterious. "Do not say 'i am afraid it will rain.' say 'i fear it will rain.' " But why? Then one day last year, it dawned on me that the book would be 100 years old in 2009, and that seemed like an excellent excuse to explore bierce's rulings. I only wish he had been a little less thorough; if i've counted correctly, his "little blacklist" has 441 entries. VT: How familiar were you with bierce's work before you started?
Multi-lingual language learning and language exchange lang-8
I received in interesting email today from a shredder deaf English learner who communicates using asl (American Sign Language). Hes now trying to learn written English. Does anyone else share his situation or have you got any tips for him? Asl is not related to English; both its grammar and vocabulary are completely different. Switching to standard written English is clearly not an easy thing. Jan Freeman, language columnist for the. Boston Globe, has published a fascinating new book: an expanded edition. Write It Right, ambrose bierce's 1909 volume on English usage, "deciphered, appraised, and annotated for 21st-century readers." we caught up with Jan to ask how bierce's century-old language peeves have held up, and what his work tells us about current usage struggles. VT: How did you first decide to embark on this project?