I stretched out the heavens with my hands, And i ordained all their host." ( Isaiah 45:12 ) "Surely my hand founded the earth, And my right hand spread out the heavens; When I call to them, they stand together." ( Isaiah 48:13 ) That. But where is the fury of the oppressor? ( Isaiah 51:13 ) It is he who made the earth by his power, Who established the world by his wisdom; And by his understanding he has stretched out the heavens. ( Jeremiah 10:12 ) It is he who made the earth by his power, Who established the world by his wisdom, And by his understanding he stretched out the heavens. ( Jeremiah 51:15 ) The burden of the word of the lord concerning Israel. Thus declares the lord who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, ( Zechariah 12:1 ) John. A new cosmology: solution to the starlight travel time problem, aigu. Ml Last updated September 2, 2013.
How to Write
Related Pages References In the book of resume Job, god Himself told Job why the earth was dark at its creation: "Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?.When I made a cloud its garment, And thick darkness its swaddling band" ( Job. A proposal for a new Solution to the light Travel Time Problem aigu. Tim Chaffey and Jason Lisle. The big-Bang God or the god of Scripture?, aigu. Universe by design: Problems with the big Bang Chapter 4, aigu. Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion. The evolution of the cosmic Microwave background Temperature: measurements of tcmb at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation. Bible verses say that God stretched out the heavens and is still stretching out the heavens (continuing action Who alone stretches out the heavens, And tramples down the waves of the sea; ( Job 9:8 ) covering Thyself with light as with a cloak, stretching. ( Psalm 104:2 ) It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers, Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain And spreads them out like a tent to dwell. ( Isaiah 40:22 ) Thus says God the lord, Who created the heavens and stretched them out, Who spread out the earth and its offspring, Who gives breath to the people on it, And spirit to those who walk in it, ( Isaiah 42:5 ).
Also, such light arriving at the earth would show enormous observable blueshifts.3 It doesnt." 8 Danny faulkner of Answers in Genesis says that he has solved young earth creationism's starlight travel time problem. . In reality, faulkner's "solution" contradicts both the bible and observational evidence of the universe. Ultimately, faulkner's model requires God to have created a false history of the universe, which produces a direct attack on the righteous character of God and cannot be tolerated within the Church! The god who would deceive his creatures with supermarket lies is not the god of the bible. The bizarre attempts of Answers in Genesis to support their failed young earth paradigm stands in stark contrast to the simplicity of the Old Earth interpretation of Genesis. The reason why distant stars are billions of light years away is because god created them billions of years ago and has been spreading them out ever since, as declared in the bible. 7 Instead of following the young earth paradigm, young earth creationists should examine the old earth interpretation, which presents the simplest and most consistent biblical and scientific explanation of creation.
Their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. ( Psalm 19:1-4 ) And the heavens proclaim His righteousness, for God Himself is judge. Selah ( Psalm 50:6 ) The heavens proclaim His righteousness, and all the peoples see his glory. (Psalm 97: 6 ) Rebuttal from aig! One remarkable thing about the "new" solution to the distant starlight problem is that it has already been rebutted on the aig website. In 2003, john. Hartnett wrote about the proposal of a rapidly expanding universe. "The universe was accelerated like fast-forwarding a videotape, and after all the light information reached the earth the rates were reduced to what we now measure. The problem with this model is that the stars would disappear from view as the light slowed down, subsequently taking millions and billions of years to get to earth.
Obviously, his model fails to correctly predict the nature of the universe. Implications about God, as bad as its correlation with the observational evidence, the new faulkner model makes some wild claims about how God created the universe. Since, according to the model, all the starlight reached the earth at the same time after the stars were created on day 4, god would have had to individually adjust the starlight from each of every star in the universe (which we know has about. As such, faulkner's model is the ultimate appearance of age argument, since god would have had to individually adjust the light paths of all those stars and then adjust the wavelength of the light from all those stars to make them appear as though they. It would be the ultimate deception by god. Contrary to faulkner's God, the bible says the heavens declare god to be truthful and righteous: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge. There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.
Problem solution, proposal, essay example for Free
7, this would mean that the universe should be less dense the further we look into space. Since the faulkner model says that we are looking kraft at airplane the universe in real time, we should see the galaxies looking further apart the more distant we look in space. However, what we see is exactly the opposite. The further we look in space, the more galaxies we see (see hubble ultra-deep field image to right). All those objects are distant galaxies in an area of the sky where no stars are visible.
The density is much higher further away than close to us (where there is only one large galaxy—Andromeda—and a few dwarf galaxies). So, did the bible get it wrong? As mentioned previously, when we look deeper in space, we are looking back in time (because of light travel times). So, this Hubble image is actually looking at the universe as it appeared nearly 12 billion years ago. Since faulkner says that we are looking at the universe in real time, his model would predict that we should see more galaxies closer to us and fewer further away.
Observational evidence (see figure at right) shows that the big Bang model prediction on the speed of distant objects is correct and faulkner's model is incorrect. The big Bang model predicts that the universe should appear to be hotter the further away in space we look, since we are looking at the universe at an early time in its history. Since light travels at a constant rate and the universe is expanding at nearly the velocity of light, we can see objects as they appeared billions of years ago. According to the big Bang model, the universe began as an extremely dense object. The collision of anti-quarks and quarks (in an excess of only one part in a billion) produced a tremendous amount of energy and heat and all the matter found in the universe.
Contrary to young earth claims, this "explosion" was highly fine-tuned, requiring that the mass density of the universe be precise to within one part in 1059. As the universe expanded, it also cooled as the heat from the annihilation of quarks and anti-quarks dissipated. As we look further in space, we look back in time and can observe the background temperature of the universe as it was billions of years ago. As predicted by the big Bang model, the universe was hotter earlier in its history 6 (see graph at right, above). Faulkner's model would predict we would not see any temperature differences as we look further in space, since it says that all such objects were created at exactly the same time, and did not result from an extremely exothermic process (such as the big Bang). So, again, faulkner's model is falsified by the observational evidence. The most spectacular failure of the faulkner model is that it directly contradicts what the bible predicts the universe should look like. Eleven verse in the Old Testament make the claim that God stretched out the heavens (and is continuing to do so).
Problem, solution, proposal by saman nazir on Prezi
According to faulkner, "i ought to emphasize that one expectation of this solution to the light travel time problem is that we probably are looking at the entire universe professional in something close to real time, regardless of how far away individual objects may." Here. Redshifts of distant objects, none, higher, higher. Temperature of the universe father from earth. No differences, hotter, hotter, density of the universe farther from earth. Less dense, more dense, more dense, the most dramatic prediction of the faulkner model is that there should be no redshifts from distant galaxies. The big Bang model predicts that the most distant objects should be moving away from us the fastest. Since light travels at a constant velocity, the wavelengths of the light from such objects should be stretched, producing a redshift, or longer wavelengths.
New solution, faulkner's new solution to the problem of distant starlight is "As a part of Gods formative work, light from the astronomical bodies was miraculously made to 'shoot' its way to the earth at an abnormally accelerated rate in order to fulfill their function. In other words, god performed a miracle. There are a couple ways this review miracle could have occurred. According to faulkner, "I propose that the stretching of the heavens may refer to rapid stretching of space to get starlight to the earth on day four, the same day that stars were made." 2, this proposal is quite an admission from aig, since. Although faulkner doesn't use the term, what he is proposing is nothing more than an extremely rapid Big Bang model for how God created the universe! Of course, if aig knew that faulkner's new solution to the distant starlight problem was really a super-fast Big Bang model in disguise, they would have gone ballistic, since they repudiate the big Bang in no uncertain terms. 3, even faulkner himself has authored an article renouncing the big Bang. 4, observational problems with the "solution". Faulkner's new model does make many more predictions than he originally thought.
separate the day from the. Since the closest star is 4 light years away, according to young earth creationism, there would have been no stars visible on earth for at least 4 years (the light travel time for the closest star). So, the stars God created on the fourth day would have been useless to accomplish His purpose of serving as "signs to mark seasons and days and years." However, according to old earth creationism, the entire universe (including the stars, sun, and earth) was created. If the stars had been created on the fourth day, even after 4 years, stars would have begun only slowly appearing over the last 6,000 years. Since the distances between stars is so great, even after 6,000 years, only about 1 of our galaxy should be observable today (see graphic, right). Since the closest large galaxy, andromeda, is over 2 million light years distant, light from that galaxy should not be visible from earth for another 2 million years. Likewise, the virgo cluster of galaxies would not be visible for 60 million years. The hubble Space telescope has detected galaxy clusters that are over 12 billion light years away. None of these objects should be visible from earth unless God did something dramatic to light travel times from these distant objects.
One of the most serious scientific problems for young earth creationism is that of distant starlight and the time it would take that starlight to reach the earth. The crux of the problem is that light travels at a set speed and nearly all the objects in the universe are farther from the earth than the young earth proposed 6,000 year age for the universe. If the young earth model for the universe is correct, we should not be able to see any other galaxies in the universe or even the majority of stars in our own Milky way galaxy. Obviously, we can see those objects, so young earth creationists are forced to do something radical with light travel times. Numerous individuals have proposed that the speed of light has changed, light was created in transit, light travels infinitely fast when coming toward the earth, among others. Young earth creationists ignore the most obvious solution paper to the problem—light from objects billions of light years away has been traveling for billions of years. Danny faulkner of Answers in Genesis (AiG) says he has a "new" solution to the problem. Let's look.
Problem, solution, essay topics, for Perfect Writing in 2018
In these 2 cases pear qa should step in and try to get in touch with the specific proposers. If the proposer is no more interessted in the proposal, pear qa should search for a new maintainer for the package or the proposal should be deleted. For assignment these steps the following time frames are proposed: For proposals in stages "draft" and "proposal". Pear qa posts a reminder comment to the proposal after 1 week of inactivity. If the proposer does not react within 2 weeks, the proposal gets deleted. For proposals in stage "finished pear qa tries to contact the maintainer 4 weeks after the proposal is finished and no release has been throwen. If the maintainer can not be contacted within 4 weeks, pear qa starts searching for a new maintainer. If no new maintainer is found within 4 weeks, the proposal gets marked as orphan. The above stated actions maybe automized inside pearweb in future, as far as possible.