We decided it from very beginning with the help. In jaipur we visited Jaswant Thada, umaid Bhawan Palace, and the gardens at the older capital of Mandore. We also went to the village safari saw the desert life. One day is sufficient to complete the jodhpur main visiting spots. Then we went to jaisalmer by mdr 32 and nh 15 by road. It took four and half hour to reach to jaisalmer (285 km). TheInteresting visiting spots are kuldhara Abandoned Village, bada bagh, jaisalmer Fort, khaba fort, patwon-ki-haveli, salim Singh-ki haveli. It takes usually 2 nights and 3 days for jaisalmer to cover all spots.
Essay on apple fruit
Winter season is blessed with shop very cool weather conditions. This winter vacation forced me to writing select best vacation destination of India. I told my papa about my desire. He agreed and he discussed with his friend's 'family vacation ideas'. After that we ultimately selected best vacation destination as Rajasthan this time. It is because we've visited other vital locations of India but never tasted the magical look of royal State of Rajasthan. Rajasthan experiences cold climatic condition during winter season similar to other states of India. Blessed with natural beauty and enriched history rajasthan has been popular destination to attract every third foreign tourists for it's palaces, historical forts and culture. The palaces of jaipur, lakes of Udaipur, and desert forts of Jodhpur, bikaner jaisalmer are among the most preferred destination of many tourists. Mehrangarh Fort (Click to see the images of Mehrangarh fort) in Jodhpur usually regarded as the best fort in Rajasthan, is a must watch fort. We made jodhpur as centre to cover Udaipur, jaipur, and jaisalmer.
But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards all areas where Flash falls short. The avalanche of media outlets offering their content for golf Apples mobile devices demonstrates that Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any kind of web content. And the 250,000 apps on Apples App Store proves that Flash isnt necessary for tens of thousands of developers to create graphically rich applications, including games. New open standards created in the mobile era, such as html5, will win on mobile devices (and PCs too). Perhaps Adobe should focus more on creating great html5 tools for the future, and less on criticizing Apple for leaving the past behind. Steve jobs, april, 2010. Out of many vacations, winter vacations has its own delight and enthusiasm.
It is their goal to help developers write cross platform apps. And Adobe has been painfully slow to adopt enhancements to Apples platforms. For example, although Mac os x has been shipping for almost 10 years now, Adobe just adopted it fully (Cocoa) two weeks ago when they shipped CS5. Adobe was the last major third party developer to fully adopt Mac. Our motivation is simple we want to provide the most advanced and summary innovative platform to our developers, and we want them to stand directly on the shoulders of this platform and create the best apps the world has ever word seen. We want to continually enhance the platform so developers can create even more amazing, powerful, fun and useful applications. Everyone wins we sell more devices because we have the best apps, developers reach a wider and wider audience and customer base, and users are continually delighted by the best and broadest selection of apps on any platform. Flash was created during the pc era for PCs and mice. Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs.
We cannot be at the mercy of a third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available to our developers. This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms. Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available on our competitors platforms. Flash is a cross platform development tool. It is not Adobes goal to help developers write the best iPhone, ipod and ipad apps.
Thoughts on Flash, apple
Sixth, the most important reason. Besides the fact that Flash is closed and proprietary, has major technical drawbacks, and doesnt support touch based devices, there is an even more important reason we do not allow Flash on iPhones, ipods and ipads. . We have discussed the downsides of using Flash to play video and interactive content from websites, but Adobe also wants developers to adopt Flash to create apps that run on our mobile devices. We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement booking and progress of the platform. If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools, they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third party chooses to adopt the new features.
In addition, Flash has not performed well on mobile devices. We have routinely asked Adobe to show us Flash performing well on a mobile device, any mobile device, for a few years now. We have never seen. Adobe publicly said that Flash would ship on a smartphone in early 2009, then the second half of 2009, then the first half of 2010, and now they say the second half of 2010. We think it will eventually ship, but were glad we didnt hold our breath.
Who knows how it will perform? Fourth, theres battery life. To achieve long battery life when playing video, mobile devices must decode the video in hardware; decoding it in software uses too much power. Many of the chips used in modern mobile devices contain a decoder called.264 an industry standard that is used in every Blu-ray dvd player and has been adopted by Apple, google (youtube Vimeo, netflix and many other companies. Although Flash has recently added support for.264, the video on almost all Flash websites currently requires an older generation decoder that is not implemented in mobile chips and must be run in software. . The difference is striking: on an iPhone, for example,.264 videos play for up to 10 hours, while videos decoded in software play for less than 5 hours before the battery is fully drained. When websites re-encode their videos using.264, they can offer them without using Flash at all.
Essay, writing on, apple -new Speech, essay, topic
Fortunately, there are over 50,000 games and entertainment titles on the App Store, and many of them are free. There are more games and entertainment titles available for iPhone, ipod and ipad than for any other platform in the world. Third, theres reliability, security and performance. Symantec recently highlighted Flash for having one of the worst security records in 2009. We also know first hand that Flash is the number one reason Macs crash. We have been working with Adobe year to plan fix these problems, but they have persisted for several years now. We dont want to reduce the reliability and security of our iPhones, ipods and ipads by adding Flash.
By making its WebKit technology open, Apple has set the standard for mobile web browsers. Second, theres the full web. Adobe has repeatedly said that Apple mobile devices cannot access the full web because 75 of video on the web is in Flash. What they dont say is that almost all this video is also available in a more modern format,.264, and viewable on iPhones, ipods and ipads. Youtube, with an estimated 40 of the webs video, shines in an app bundled on all Apple mobile devices, with the ipad offering perhaps the best discovery and viewing experience ever. Add to this video from Vimeo, netflix, facebook, abc, cbs, cnn, msnbc, fox News, espn, npr, time, the new York times, The wall Street journal, Sports Illustrated, people, national geographic, and many, many others. IPhone, ipod report and ipad users arent missing much video. Another Adobe claim is that Apple devices cannot play flash games.
google and many others, lets web developers create advanced graphics, typography, animations and transitions without relying on third party browser plug-ins (like flash). Html5 is completely open and controlled by a standards committee, of which Apple is a member. Apple even creates open standards for the web. For example, apple began with a small open source project and created WebKit, a complete open-source html5 rendering engine that is the heart of the safari web browser used in all our products. WebKit has been widely adopted. Google uses it for Androids browser, palm uses it, nokia uses it, and rim (Blackberry) has announced they will use it too. Almost every smartphone web browser other than Microsofts uses WebKit. .
I wanted to jot down some of our thoughts on Adobes Flash products so that customers and critics may better understand why we do not allow Flash on iPhones, ipods and ipads. Adobe summary has characterized our decision as being primarily business driven they say we want to protect our App Store but in reality it is based on technology issues. Adobe claims that we are a closed system, and that Flash is open, but in fact the opposite is true. Adobes Flash products are 100 proprietary. They are only available from Adobe, and Adobe has sole authority as to their future enhancement, pricing, etc. While Adobes Flash products are widely available, this does not mean they are open, since they are controlled entirely by Adobe and available only from Adobe. By almost any definition, Flash is a closed system. Apple has many proprietary products too. Though the operating system for the iphone, ipod and ipad is proprietary, we strongly believe that all standards pertaining to the web should be open.
How to write an essay on your iphone
Apple has a long relationship with Adobe. In fact, we met Adobes founders when they were in their proverbial garage. Apple was their first big customer, adopting their Postscript language for revelation our new Laserwriter printer. Apple invested in Adobe and owned around 20 of the company for many years. The two companies worked closely together to pioneer desktop publishing and there were many good times. Since that golden era, the companies have grown apart. Apple went through its near death experience, and Adobe was drawn to the corporate market with their Acrobat products. Today the two companies still work together to serve their joint creative customers mac users buy around half of Adobes Creative suite products but beyond that there are few joint interests.